BLOG

CA Agency List

One of the prime goals of the National Tax-Limitation Committee is to support legislation and candidates/elected officials, that/whom fight to keep government’s size to “the right size” or optimal size. Below is a list of CA agencies and institutions (as of 2010). Is this how we manage to achieve “the right size”? We think not! Please help …

READ MORE

GAO FINDS THE FAT, WHO’S GOING TO TRIM IT?

GOVMONEYWASTE

It appears the only thing NOT being duplicated in the federal system, is copies of the Government Accountability Office’s March 2011 report entitled “Opportunities to Reduce Potential Duplication in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and Enhance Revenue”, or simply report number 11-318SP. It would seem so since these programs are still in place, not-consolidated, and …

READ MORE

NTLC PRESIDENT LEW UHLER COMMENTS ON GOP 2013 BUDGET

GOPBUDGET.RYAN

March 20, 2012

National Tax-Limitation Committee President & Founder Lew Uhler released a press release today that included his comments on the 2013 GOP budget recently released. In the release Uhler stated “While the Obama budget projects deficits and an increasing debt burden as far as the eye cab see, the Ryan-Camp budget cuts spending, …

READ MORE

NTLC ANNOUNCES SUPPORT FOR “THE STATE HEALTH FLEXIBILITY ACT”

HR4160IMAGE

In a letter posted March 14, 2012, National Tax Limitation Committee President, Lew Uhler, urged members of congress and taxpayers alike to support HR 4160 “The State Health Flexibility Act”. …

READ MORE

PLF BRIEF TO SUPREME COURT TARGETS FEDERAL HEALTH-INSURANCE MANDATE

Pacific Legal Foundation, the National Tax Limitation Committee, and the Cato Institute, along with a number of other pro-freedom organizations, today urged the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the individual mandate provision of the new federal health care law. In an amicus brief, the organizations contend that the mandate — requiring virtually every American who is not covered by an employer to buy government-dictated health insurance — exceeds Congress’ authority under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. …

READ MORE

JERRY’S LEGACY?

jerry_brown_3-300x225

“He calls it a legacy; I call it lunacy,” Lew Uhler told us of the governor’s rail advocacy. Mr. Uhler is the president of the Roseville-based National Tax Limitation Committee. “It has nothing to do with anything his father would remotely touch.” …

READ MORE

HOORAY FOR HIGH GAS PRICES

Gas_Prices.512.512

No! I don’t like high pump prices anymore than anyone else. BUT, gas price increases are the clearest possible signal of the failed policies of Barack Obama.

 

He stopped oil drilling in the gulf. He opposes drilling in Alaska. He rejected the Keystone Pipeline. His regulators are doing everything in their power to slow …

READ MORE

MEMO FOR THE MOVEMENT

car-accident

A Transportation Bill should not be used as an Opportunity to Increase Federal Spending RE: The next transportation reauthorization is shaping up to be yet another big spending boondoggle.  Despite four straight trillion dollar annual deficits, Congress refuses to accept the need to budget responsibly and prioritize transportation spending.  Instead, both the House (H.R.7) and …

READ MORE

Senator McConnell on The Balanced Budget Amendment

Senator McConnell released the following video message regarding the need to pass a Balanced Budget Amendment to the United States Constitution to put our fiscal house in order:

.youtube_sc iframe.yp{display:none;}The Adobe Flash Player is required for video playback.Get the latest Flash Player or Watch this video on YouTube.

Editorial: Californians not willing to tax themselves

But not so fast. For one thing, polls this far away from an election are highly volatile. As was pointed out by Joel Fox of the Small Business Action Committee, just look at the polls in the Republican primaries. One day Mitt Romney’s poll numbers make him look invincible. The next day he’s losing in South Carolina to Newt Gingrich. And who knows what will happen in Florida on Jan. 31. A major factor is that people are not focusing on the November election. It’s still more than nine months away. No one has seen the ads, pro and con, for the Brown initiative. Other tax-increase initiatives also may be on the ballot. Gov. Brown’s “temporary,” five-year tax increase includes two components: an increase of 1 or 2 percentage points in the state income tax for those making $250,000 or more per year. And a half-cent sales tax increase. But when the poll broke down the two taxes, Californians became schizophrenic. The income-tax boost on the “rich” was favored by 68 percent of likely voters. But 64 percent opposed raising sales taxes, which everybody pays. That brings to mind the old saying, “Don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that man behind the tree.” We also don’t know what condition the economy will be in later this year. The major economic surveys, such as those by Chapman University, anticipate continued moderate growth. But nobody knows what lies ahead. A sudden shock, like the September 2008 financial meltdown, could strike the country. War in the Persian Gulf could send oil prices into the stratosphere. And the European debt crisis could crash. People in a renewed recession would be less likely to increase their own tax burdens. Then there’s the finding that 55 percent of likely voters, in the PPIC summary, “believe state government could cut spending and still provide the same level of services.” So people still are skeptical that government has done enough to save on current spending. “Raising taxes at this point is just so beyond the pale,” Lew Uhler told us; he’s the president of the Roseville-based National Tax-Limitation Committee. “I just don’t see people buying into the class-warfare stuff. They’re not only trying to increase taxes on high-income families, but also the sales tax.” He pointed out that the governor remains an enthusiast for the California High-Speed Rail Authority and its spending plan of at least $99 billion on a project widely considered a boondoggle. “He’s re-establishing his Gov. Moonbeam name by this craziness,” Mr. Uhler said. The last time Californians passed a tax-increase initiative was in 2004 with Proposition 63. It increased state income taxes on millionaires by 1 percentage point to fund mental-health programs. Yet it passed with just 54 percent of the vote even though opponents spent just $13,000 compared with proponents’ approximately $4.7 million. And that was during the height of the real estate boom, when it seemed the good times never would end. Times are different now. The economy still is hobbled. Any tax increases will face solid opposition. Bring it on. …

READ MORE